Join CNET.com.au: Receive free newsletters, post to forums and win prizes. Sign up now!

It's a nice day for an iPod wedding

By Alorie Gilbert on 21 September 2005

Tags: digital | dj | ipod | music | player | wedding | djs | couple

As a bride-to-be, Jessica Spence was taking extra care to note the details at a friend's wedding recently.

One thing that stood out to her was an idle-looking DJ who hit a few buttons on his laptop and appeared to take the rest of the night easy.

"I swear to god, the DJ was playing Solitaire throughout the dinner and cocktail hour," Spence noted in an online forum at wedding-planning site TheKnot.com. "It seems sort of silly to pay someone a lot of money to sit at a laptop and put on songs when we can do the exact same thing."

With their confidence in wedding DJs dented, Spence and her fiance are counting on their iPod to provide the musical entertainment at their wedding reception later this month. They're among a growing number of couples making personal music players a central part of their big day.

Keeping wedding budgets in check is one reason couples are going the digital-DJ route. According to wedding-planning guide Bridal Bargains, professional DJs charge an average of $600 per wedding. A live band can run upwards of $1,000. If a couple has already plunked down $400 or so for an iPod or an iRiver, and spent hours refining their digital-music collection, it's easy to see why a DJ might seem superfluous.

"What could be easier?" said Lori Leibovich, editor of IndieBride.com, a Web site for brides. "You bring it, you program it, it sounds great. It doesn't surprise me at all that more people are doing it."

Do-it-yourself wedding music has emerged as a popular discussion topic on IndieBride's discussion forums, as well as those at TheKnot.com. In another signal that the trend is on the rise, the latest edition of the best-selling book "Bridal Bargains" features a section on "the iPod wedding."

Celebrities are looking into iPods as DJs, too. Rock star Alanis Morissette, who's engaged to actor Ryan Reynolds, has said during recent interviews that she may use an iPod at her wedding next year.

Indulging your inner DJ
Saving money obviously isn't the only motivation. Many couples view their wedding music as an opportunity to express themselves and put a personal stamp on their event. A digital-music player seems to set a more relaxed tone, too, one bride-to-be said.

"I think it will really add to the feel of the night not being so staged," said Emily Mighdoll, who is planning to use an iPod at her wedding next year. "There's music, but no one will be telling us what to do the whole night. It's also sort of neat being able to control a piece of how the party goes."

It's also the ultimate way to indulge a bride or groom's inner disc jockey. Grooms, in particular, find that aspect appealing, Mighdoll said.

"My fiance is definitely an audiophile and has tons and tons of music--anything we'd want a DJ to play and more," she said. "He's definitely selecting the playlists." (Mighdoll, however, said she's retaining veto power over the song selection.)

But do-it-yourself wedding music is not as simple as it might sound. For one thing, most couples find that they need to borrow or rent a sound system, including speakers, amplifiers, cables and a microphone. Rental costs can easily mount up.

Couples may also want to ask a trusted friend or family member to play MC and manage music transitions from dinner to dancing. Others advise using a laptop to sidestep some of pocket-size players' limitations, such as some iPods' 2- or 3-second pause between songs. Backing up music to a CD in case of a technical malfunction is also not a bad idea.

Music selection can also be tricky, a former radio DJ writes on IndieBride's online forum. "From a DJ's perspective, the music is not for you," she writes. "You are not playing your favourite songs. You are playing songs people want to hear and that people want to dance to."

She recommends sticking to crowd pleasers like "YMCA" by the Village People and "Whip It" by Devo.

Professional DJs say all of this detail is too much for most amateurs to handle. That's why the technology isn't putting any DJs out of business, said Jim Tremayne, editor of DJ Times magazine.

"A good, experienced, professional mobile DJ will offer more than music selection," Tremayne said in an e-mail interview. "That DJ will offer the timing that an iPod can't. He'll do introductions. He'll play the music at the exact time that you want. He'll offer the expertise of someone who's done this hundreds of times."

Dj Anthony
31/07/2007 12:07 PM

Ha, so you think you can be in DJ using an IPOD? Goodluck. I have been a wedding DJ for over 10 years boasting over 800 weddings. I can assure you that playing music to wedding guests is a little harder than ramping your IPOD up with some of your lame tunes. I have seen it so many many times, a weding couple want the Dj to play the tunes that they personally like and the guests hate them. I suggest you delay your wedding, save up your $600 bucks and hire a professional for the day.

Report offensive content

ellie323
03/08/2007 04:45 AM

You don't get it-- the wedding is FOR the Bride and Groom... You make it seem like "WHo cares about the bride and grrom- all that matters is what their guests want". I have seen a good friend just about cry at her wedding because the DJ was not following their list that they all had agreed on. You're always going to have a few guests who want different music-- but who's paying for their dinner, and for YOU to be there? All I know is that I'm going with the hand ol' Ipod. I know I can trust it to play some great music.

Report offensive content

Nigel2112
01/12/2007 05:53 PM

Welllll, it may seem like a nice idea but then you could also get a friend to take the photos and another to drive the limo. Her sister could bake the cake and make the dress while you're at it. No, nothing really beats a extroverted DJ with a rockin sound system and 10,000 songs at his disposal. That's why a DJ gets paid to be a DJ, you can't do what they do, iPod or not. This is a case of a journalist seeing three couples using iPods for their wedding receptions. Thinking he spots a trend he goes haywire and writes a piece like this to use on a low-news day.

Report offensive content

Owner of a large wedding venue
01/02/2008 01:49 PM

Why take on the added stress putting together the tunes the sound system and lights by the time you rent everything you need it will cost you at least 500.00 and hours and hours of time plus do you really want to incovienence one of your guests to set up and run the show?If you hire a pro it will be better than anything you can come up with. The day is about everyone who came to share it having a good memerable time not about making everyone listen to the BG taste in music. Any Bride/Groom that thinks its more important that they hear what they want regardless of what the other people like is selfish and maybe should grow up a bit before they tie the knot.

Report offensive content

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.


  • News

  • Features

  • Oi!

  • Must read

  • Whaddyareckon?: Mac vs. PC

  • Sydney Apple Store: Fans say wait was worth it

  • Sydney Apple store: View from the queue

  • Sydney Apple store video tour

  • Apple replaces .Mac with MobileMe

  • Apple uncovers Sydney store for the first time

  • A bridge to the future of the iPod

  • Aussie scientists put faster laptops, iPods in a spin

  • The geeks were right; music labels bow to technology

More news »

Find the right mp3 player

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    The Explain Series

    • Samsung S2 Pebble

      Samsung S2 Pebble

      Samsung has officially announced the S2 Pebble, a screenless 2GB MP3 player that retails for under AU$50.

    • SanDisk Sansa Fuze

      SanDisk Sansa Fuze

      Hey there, Nano killer! The Sansa Fuze has its sights set on Apple's skinny player, but comes up a little short. Still, with its extra features and ease of use, it's one to put on the shortlist.

    • Sony NWZ-A826KB Walkman

      Sony NWZ-A826KB Walkman

      The limited-edition, Bluetooth-enabled A826KB looks snazzy, and we're glad SonicStage is gone, but we wish the player was available in higher capacities.

    • Sony NWZ-A720 Walkman

      Sony NWZ-A720 Walkman

      Sony's new batch of Walkmans looks lovely and we're happy to see the end of SonicStage, but the features are a little bland compared to competitors' models.

    • Logitech Transporter

      Logitech Transporter

      If you're looking for a high-end media streamer — and we're talking almost ridiculously lofty, here — then the Logitech Transporter could be the ticket.

    More reviews »

    Membership benefits

    Win prizes and other promotion benefits

    Win prizes and other promotion benefits

    As a CNET.com.au member, you're eligible to enter and win any prizes on our site. Sign up for a free CNET.com.au membership now!